| July 28, 2004 We have
been requested by Nasutra LLC to review the regulatory status for the above
dietary supplement product for compliance with the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (FDC Act) and regulations enforced by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 1.
EXPERIENCE OF THIS FIRM Our law firm generally confines its
position to assisting corporations and other law firms in matters involving: (1)
the regulation of foods, drugs, medical devices, and cosmetics by FDA under the
FDC Act; or, (2) the regulation of the same type of products by other federal,
state or international agencies. My own practice includes
15 years as general counsel in charge of legal and regulatory affairs for a company
extensively regulated by FDA, three years as the west coast regulatory partner
of Hyman, Phelps & McNamara, a Washington, D.C. based law firm with the largest
food and drug practice in the United States and 12 years as a sole practitioner
specializing in FDA regulatory matters. I am licensed as a registered pharmacist
and attorney and admitted to practice law and pharmacy in the states of California
and Michigan. 2. LEGAL REVIEW - DIETARY SUPPLEMENT HEALTH
& EDUCATION ACT OF 1994 (DSHEA) A. Title The law
affecting the sale of dietary supplements is officially named the "Dietary
Supplement Health and Education Act" (DSHEA). Its provisions are amendments
to the FDC Act, adding to changes in the FDC Act begun by the Nutrition Labeling
and Education Act of 1990 (NLEA). B. Definition of "Dietary
Supplement" A dietary supplement is defined as a "product . . .
intended to supplement the diet that bears or contains one or more of" certain
specified "dietary ingredients." These include "a vitamin,"
"a mineral," "an herb or other botanical," "an amino
acid," "a dietary substance for use by man to supplement the diet by
increasing the total dietary intake," and "a concentrate, metabolite,
constituent, extract, or combination" of any of the foregoing ingredients. This
law settles a fundamental definitional matter by providing a broad, expansive
definition of "dietary supplement," to include even products that FDA
nutritionists would regard as not having any nutritional value. A
dietary supplement must either be in the form of a tablet, capsule, powder, softgel,
gelcap, or liquid form that is not "represented" as "a conventional
food." C. Dietary Supplements Deemed To Be Foods
The DSHEA provides that, "[e]xcept for purposes of section 201(g), a dietary
supplement shall be deemed to be a food." This will normally prevent FDA
from arguing that a product that otherwise meets the requirements of law as a
dietary supplement is nevertheless not a food, because it is not used primarily
for its taste, aroma, or nutritional value. D. Exemption
From "Food Additive" Status One of the most important
improvements of this law is that it provides that the term "food additive"
no longer applies to a dietary ingredient in, or intended for use in, a dietary
supplement. Under the FDC Act, a substance added to or likely
to become a component of a food that is not "generally recognized as safe"
(not GRAS), by "experts," based on published scientific literature,
is subject to regulation as a "food additive," which means it may not
be used until and unless FDA issues a regulation explicitly permitting such use. In
the past, FDA has frequently alleged "unapproved food additive" status
against many popular dietary supplement ingredients. This law eliminates that
risk for dietary ingredients used in dietary supplements. E.
New Safety Standards The trade-off, however, is that this
law replaces the food additive provisions with some new safety standards for dietary
supplements. The DSHEA provides that a dietary supplement
may be "adulterated" if it "presents a significant or unreasonable
risk of illness or injury under . . . conditions of use recommended or suggested
in labeling, or . . . if no conditions of use are suggested or recommended in
labeling, under ordinary conditions of use." The dietary supplement law expressly
states that FDA "shall bear the burden of proof" in court if it asserts
that a dietary supplement is adulterated under this standard. There
are additional requirements for a dietary ingredient, i.e., an ingredient that
was not marketed in the United States before October 15, 1994 or was not present
in the food supply as an article used for food in a form in which the food has
not been chemically altered. F. Statements of Nutritional
Support The NLEA provides that no "health claim"
may appear in the labeling of food products, including dietary supplements, unless
FDA has first approved use of the claim in a regulation. A "health claim"
is one that "characterizes the relationship of any nutrient . . . to a disease
or a health-related condition." This law and FDA's implementing regulations
still apply to dietary supplements. But the DSHEA spells
out an exception for dietary supplements to the general requirements for FDA approval
of health claims for four types of "statements of nutritional support."
These four types of statements include: 1. A "statement
[that] claims a benefit related to a classical nutrient deficiency disease and
discloses the prevalence of such disease in the United States." 2.
A statement that "describes the role of a nutrient or dietary ingredient
intended to affect the structure or function in humans." 3.
A statement that "characterizes the documented mechanism by which a nutrient
or dietary ingredient acts to maintain such structure or function." 4.
A statement that "describes general well-being from consumption of a nutrient
or dietary ingredient." The law provides that such a
statement may be made in labeling if: 1. The manufacturer
"has substantiation that such statement is truthful and not misleading"; 2.
The labeling contains, prominently displayed, the following additional text: "This
statement has not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product
is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease"; and 3.
The manufacturer notifies FDA "no later than 30 days after the first marketing
of the dietary supplement with such statement that such a statement is being made. 3.
ANALYSIS A. Background We understand that Nasutra
LLC is interested in marketing a new dietary supplement product identified as
Nasutra for sexual stamina and endurance health related benefits. The product
will be made from a highly concentrated extract of 10 Chinese herbs identified
as: Cynomorium songaricum, Atractylodes macrocephalia, Lycium barbarum, Epimedium
sagittatum, Rehmannia glutinosa, Schisandra chinensis, Polygonum multiflorum,
Cinnamonum aromaticum, Amomum villosum, Panax ginseng. All these herbal ingredients
have been used extensively, and are well characterized and listed in the "Herbs
of Commerce," 1992 edition. See 21 CFR Section 101.4(h). The
Nasutra formulation has been studied extensively in China to demonstrate
safety and efficacy for sexual health benefits. We have also reviewed documentation
and Analysis Certificates provided by Nasutra LLC confirming that the herbal
ingredients in the Nasutra product have been previously analyzed by HPLC
and other laboratory methods to show that they are natural extracts with no added
ingredients including hormones and synthetic drugs such as sildenafil (Viagra®)
or apomorphine. B. Nasutra Dietary Supplement Status
We understand that the dietary supplement product Nasutra will consist of
the ten herbal ingredients discussed above and have label claims that the product
will "generate harder erections, increase sexual stamina and endurance, and
greatly reduce the recovery time between sexual intervals" and will be identified
on the label as a dietary supplement. We have reviewed the
dietary ingredients and proposed labeling claims for Nasutra and find that
its intended use is consistent with the definition of a dietary supplement provided
by Section 201(ff) of the FDC Act (21 U.S.C. § 321(ff)). The ingredients
contained in Nasutra are all herbal dietary ingredients that are included
within the broad legal definition of a dietary supplement. See 21 U.S.C. §
321(ff)(1)(C) and (F). As discussed above, Section 6 of DSHEA
added a paragraph 6 to Section 403(r) of the FDC Act (i.e. the health claims section
of NLEA) which provides for four types of nutritional support claims. The second
type of claim relates to structure and function claims. Section 403(r)(6) of the
FDC Act permits a label statement for a dietary supplement product to be made
if it characterizes the role of a nutrient or dietary ingredient that is intended
to affect the structure or function of humans. Section 403(r)(6)(B)
and (C) of the FDC Act requires a manufacturer that includes a structure and function
claim in its product labeling to have substantiation that the claim is truthful
and not misleading and that the statement contains prominently and in bold face
the following: "This statement has not been evaluated by the Food and Drug
Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent
any disease." A manufacturer is further required to notify FDA of the use
of the claim no later than 30 days after first marketing of the dietary supplement
labeled with the claim. FDA has issued a final regulation
at 21 CFR Section 101.93(f) and (g) regarding "Statements made for dietary
supplements concerning the affect of a product on the structure or function of
the body." Our research of this regulation and FDA's preamble discussion
in the Federal Register when the regulation was issued suggests that FDA considered
"arouses or increases sexual desire," "improves sexual performance,"
and "decreases sexual function associated with aging" to be acceptable
structure/function claims because those claims do not imply a disease but natural
function of the body. We would consider the Nasutra dietary supplement label
claims to be structure/function claims allowed by Section 403(r)(6) of the FDC
Act and consistent with the position of FDA on several function type claims. We
and other Nasutra LLC experts have reviewed the clinical studies conducted
in China on the Nasutra formulation that provide scientific support and
clinical substantiation for the structure/function claims contained in the labeling
for Nasutra. We have further reviewed the Nasutra product label and
find it in compliance with the labeling requirements for dietary supplements specified
in an FDA regulation at 21 CFR Section 101.36. We intend
to instruct and assist Nasutra LLC in sending FDA the thirty (30) day post-marketing
notice also required by Section 403(r)(6)(c) of the FDC Act and the FDA regulation
at 21 CFR § 101.93(a) and (b). 4. CONCLUSION In
summary, it is our opinion, based on a review of the herbal ingredients, formulation,
product label and labeling claims, and other documents provided by Nasutra
LLC, that the marketing of the Nasutra product would be consistent with
its regulatory status as a dietary supplement under the FDC Act and regulations
enforced by FDA. |